Webinar

An SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) is a detailed inventory of all components—open source and proprietary—within a software product. It matters because knowing exactly what’s in your software reduces blind spots and improves transparency for customers and regulators. As security expectations grow, SBOMs provide the foundation for identifying vulnerabilities tied to specific components. For software producers, this insight helps accelerate remediation efforts and improves overall product trustworthiness.

SBOMs enhance security by providing a structured, consistent view of every component inside a software product. With this visibility, organizations can quickly determine whether they are affected by known vulnerabilities and take action. While an SBOM alone doesn’t fix security issues, it enables more efficient vulnerability management when paired with strong processes. It ultimately strengthens your ability to reduce risk across the software lifecycle.

Governments—particularly in the U.S.—are increasingly requiring SBOMs for software sold to federal agencies, with guidelines moving from optional to mandatory. Regulations now call for greater transparency, secure development practices, and accurate documentation of software components. While not every organization is legally required today, momentum is rapidly growing. Software producers who adopt SBOM practices early reduce risk and future-proof their business against evolving compliance demands.

An SBOM is a static document that reflects what’s in a product, not how securely it was developed or how risks are actively being managed. True security requires continuous processes, developer education, automated tooling, and cultural alignment across teams. SBOMs offer the starting point, but without proper workflows and reporting, they cannot provide a complete picture of risk exposure. Software producers need a layered approach to security to get meaningful value.

An SBOM identifies all components in a product, while a VDR (Vulnerability Disclosure Report) outlines known vulnerabilities associated with those components. A VEX report goes a step further by clarifying which vulnerabilities are actually exploitable in your product and which are not. Combined, these tools help software producers distinguish real threats from false positives. This layered understanding improves communication with customers and reduces wasted effort.

When new vulnerabilities surface, organizations with SBOMs can immediately determine whether affected components exist in their products. This reduces time spent manually searching for exposure points and accelerates decision-making. Paired with VDR and VEX processes, teams can prioritize the vulnerabilities that truly matter. The result is a faster, more confident response that minimizes business and customer impact.

Common challenges include inconsistent SBOM formats, reliance on spreadsheets, and confusion about how SBOMs fit into broader security practices. Many organizations also struggle with tooling integration and defining clear processes for using SBOM data effectively. The transition requires cultural change, better developer training, and more automation. Despite these hurdles, the long-term payoff in resilience and compliance is significant.

SBOMs increase transparency and trust, which are critical for customers making decisions about safety‑critical or high‑compliance software. Products supported by clear security documentation often face fewer barriers during procurement and auditing. This leads to smoother sales cycles and stronger enterprise adoption. Additionally, incorporating SBOM-driven security practices can become a differentiator that elevates a software producer’s value proposition.

The most effective approach is to generate and update SBOMs at key stages: design, development, testing, and production deployments. Integrating SBOM creation with CI/CD pipelines ensures that they remain current and accurate. Developers should be trained on secure component selection and versioning practices, helping prevent issues before they enter the product. This lifecycle approach makes SBOMs far more actionable and reliable for security teams.

The software ecosystem evolves constantly—new vulnerabilities appear, components age out, and threat landscapes shift. Because of this, a product that appears secure today may face new risks tomorrow. Continuous monitoring, updated SBOMs, and ongoing vulnerability analysis ensure that security doesn’t stagnate. Treating security as an ongoing journey helps organizations steadily reduce risk rather than chase an unrealistic goal of perfection.