Webinar

How to Manage Open Source Risk in M&A

Learn how to manage open source risk in M&A with guidance on licensing, compliance, SBOMs, governance, and due diligence from Revenera and industry experts.

Original Air Date: June 18, 2025

In this Webinar

Overview

If your team ships software that leans on open source, this webinar is a must-watch. You’ll see how open source choices made early on can dramatically increase risk in mergers and acquisitions—sometimes even to the point of “buying a lawsuit” or delaying signing and closing. You’ll learn practical ways to build a clean, accurate inventory of all third‑party components, use software composition analysis effectively, and generate SBOMs, notices, and attributions that actually stand up to diligence. 

The session breaks down the most problematic license types, what they really mean for your products and business models (SaaS, private cloud, on‑prem), and how to avoid unpleasant surprises around copyleft and dual‑licensed components. You’ll also explore how to prioritize remediation so you’re not trying to fix years of technical and legal debt in a frantic two‑week sprint right before a deal closes. Beyond the technical tactics, the webinar explains governance best practices—policies, lightweight processes, OSPOs, and ISO 5230/OpenChain frameworks—that show buyers you run a disciplined program and can help protect your valuation. Security isn’t left out either: you’ll see how continuous monitoring and up‑to‑date vulnerability data fit into a sustainable open source strategy. 

Watch this webinar to walk away with a practical playbook you can start applying now—whether you’re preparing for an exit, acquiring another company, or simply want to de‑risk your open source use before it becomes a deal blocker.

Recap

Key Themes and Takeaways

Understanding Why Open Source Risk Surges in M&A

M&A amplifies every underlying open source issue—license noncompliance, missing attributions, vague component origins, outdated policies, and unknown security vulnerabilities. What may be a manageable internal risk can quickly become a financial, legal, or valuation concern once another company begins diligence. The webinar highlights how open source can influence deal timelines, shift build‑versus‑buy decisions, and even determine whether a transaction proceeds at all.

The Foundations of Open Source Governance

A major emphasis is on establishing streamlined, lightweight policies and processes that guide how open source is selected, approved, tracked, and updated. Rather than recommending heavyweight bureaucracy, the session outlines how effective governance is achievable with simple, clear, and consistently applied rules. Strong governance not only reduces risk but also signals organizational maturity to potential acquirers.

Building a Complete and Actionable Software Inventory

The webinar underscores that you can’t manage open source risk without knowing exactly what you’re using. Attendees learn how inventories should include component names, versions, licenses, usage context, distribution models, and release history. Having this information up front prevents last‑minute scrambles during diligence and allows teams to proactively identify outdated libraries, security gaps, or problematic dependencies.

The Expanding Importance of SBOMs

Software Bills of Materials (SBOMs) are positioned as a core requirement—not just for diligence, but for secure software development overall. The webinar explains how SBOMs enable transparency, support vulnerability monitoring, and provide a standardized way to share component data with partners, regulators, and potential buyers. They also serve as a foundational artifact for demonstrating compliance readiness.

Notice and Attribution Compliance as Non‑Negotiables

While often overlooked, the requirement to include proper license texts, copyright notices, and attribution statements is shown to be one of the most frequently mishandled areas of open source use. The webinar breaks down why missing notices create immediate compliance failures and how producing accurate notice files early can dramatically smooth an acquirer’s review process.

Security Risks Within Open Source Components

The session emphasizes that open source is neither inherently more nor less secure than proprietary code—it simply requires active oversight. Vulnerabilities emerge over time, so continuous monitoring is crucial. By tying security risks back to inventory quality and tooling maturity, the webinar demonstrates how organizations can quickly pinpoint exposure when new CVEs appear.

Deep Scanning and File‑Level Evidence

One of the most compelling topics is the value of deep code scanning to detect hidden snippets, embedded licenses, or copied code that traditional SCA tools fail to identify. The webinar illustrates how developers often paste code fragments containing partial license text or copyright notices, which can trigger obligations that teams never realized existed. Capturing file‑level evidence becomes essential for producing accurate SBOMs, notices, and remediation plans.

Prioritizing and Managing Remediation

Remediation can be costly and time‑consuming, especially when deferred for years. The webinar outlines how prioritizing remediation based on licensing impact, security severity, and deal timing enables teams to avoid unmanageable workloads. Attendees gain practical guidance on sequencing fixes, identifying what must be addressed before signing, and determining what can be negotiated as post‑close obligations.

Establishing an Open Source Program Office (OSPO)

The OSPO is presented as a crucial structure for organizations looking to scale their open source use responsibly. It centralizes policies, reviews, approvals, SBOM creation, and cross‑department alignment. The webinar explains how an OSPO signals reliability to acquirers and how frameworks like ISO 5230/OpenChain help companies demonstrate formal compliance maturity.

Contractual and Deal‑Level Implications

Beyond technical review, the session explores how open source impacts transaction agreements, including representations, warranties, indemnities, and remediation covenants. These provisions reflect the buyer’s need for transparency and the seller’s need to limit liability. The recap clarifies how accurate diligence artifacts directly affect the fairness of these clauses and the overall deal risk profile.

Speakers

Venkat Ram Donga

Venkat Ram Donga
Director, Product Management
Flexera

Frequently Asked Questions

Open source usage becomes far more consequential in an M&A scenario because acquirers need full transparency into what they are buying. Hidden licensing obligations, missing notices, or unknown vulnerabilities can delay closing or reduce valuation. Even small compliance gaps can escalate into legal exposure when ownership changes hands. For software producers, preparing early ensures far smoother diligence and fewer surprises that can derail a deal.

Licensing issues often stem from misunderstanding how copyleft, dual‑licensed, or restrictive licenses impact distribution models. A component that seems harmless in SaaS may trigger obligations if the product expands to on‑prem deployment. Licensing risks also arise from copied snippets containing embedded license text that developers may not recognize. By evaluating license terms early, teams can avoid unintentional obligations that surface only during diligence.

A complete inventory gives teams visibility into every third‑party component, version, license, and usage pattern. This clarity lets you assess risk exposure—such as outdated components, abandoned projects, or incompatible license types—before they become problems. When inventory data is accurate, remediation can be prioritized based on risk and deal timing instead of rushed, reactive fixes. Software producers gain better long‑term control over compliance and security posture.

A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is a detailed list of all components that make up a software product. It offers transparency to partners, customers, and acquirers while supporting vulnerability monitoring and license compliance reviews. As SBOM adoption increases across the industry, companies with well‑maintained SBOMs appear more mature and trustworthy in diligence. They also respond faster when security issues or licensing conflicts arise.

Notice and attribution files provide required license texts, copyright statements, and acknowledgments associated with the open source you use. Missing or incomplete notices are among the most common compliance failures uncovered in diligence. Properly maintained notice files demonstrate respect for license terms and reduce legal questions during audits. They also ensure your customers receive accurate disclosures as required by many licenses.

Open source isn’t inherently more or less secure than proprietary code, but its security posture changes over time as vulnerabilities are discovered. Without continuous monitoring, teams may unknowingly ship components containing CVEs. Integrating security checks into development workflows allows faster detection and upgrading of vulnerable libraries. This proactive approach strengthens product resilience and reduces the burden of remediation later.

Deep scanning analyzes source files at a granular level to detect copied code snippets, embedded license fragments, or hidden dependencies that standard SCA tools miss. Developers often paste segments from blogs, forums, or repositories containing partial licenses that carry compliance obligations. Deep evidence scanning uncovers these small but critical risks early. It is especially essential in M&A, where undiscovered snippets may complicate negotiations.

Remediation should be prioritized based on licensing severity, security risk, and business impact. Some issues must be resolved before a deal signs, while lower‑risk items can be addressed over time. Teams should consider distribution models, customer impact, and compatibility when deciding what to fix first. A thoughtful remediation plan helps avoid costly, rushed updates under deadline pressure.

An OSPO centralizes open source governance, overseeing policies, reviews, SBOM creation, security monitoring, and developer education. Companies often form an OSPO when their use of open source becomes strategic, distributed, or large‑scale. The structure helps ensure consistent compliance and reduces risk across teams. An OSPO also demonstrates organizational maturity to customers and acquirers, strengthening trust in your development processes.

Open source issues influence representations, warranties, indemnities, and closing conditions in acquisition deals. Buyers want confirmation that the software they’re acquiring is free of undisclosed obligations or legal exposure. Sellers with clean inventories, strong policies, and compliance artifacts gain better negotiating leverage. Addressing open source risks early helps both sides avoid contentious negotiations and unexpected post‑close liabilities.

Resources

Want to learn more?

See how Revenera's end-to-end solution delivers a complete, accurate SBOM while managing license compliance and security.