Webinar

Mitigating Risks in Open Source and Software Supply Chains: A Global Outlook

Explore global regulations, security risks, and best practices to manage open source and software supply chain vulnerabilities.

Original Air Date: October 21, 2024

In this Webinar

Overview

In today’s software landscape, open source is everywhere—and so are the risks that come with it. This webinar dives into the rapidly evolving regulatory environment across the U.S. and EU, breaking down exactly what software producers need to know to stay compliant and competitive. You’ll explore how new cybersecurity rules, executive orders, and resilience directives will fundamentally reshape expectations for software security, governance, and transparency. Real-world examples—from supply chain disruptions to high‑profile ransomware incidents—highlight why knowing what’s in your codebase is no longer optional.

You’ll learn how open source usage, licensing models, and hidden dependencies can create legal, operational, and security challenges that directly impact your products and revenue. The session also unpacks how SBOMs, automated scanning, and better open source management practices can help future‑proof your organization. And because AI-generated code is becoming the new normal, you’ll gain clarity on the risks tied to generative AI tools and what safeguards are essential. By the end, you’ll walk away with practical, actionable guidance for strengthening your software supply chain, reducing risk, and building trust with customers and regulators alike.

If you produce software today, you cannot afford to miss this.

Recap

Key Themes and Takeaways

Understanding the Ubiquity and Value of Open Source Software

The webinar opens by grounding viewers in the reality that open source is deeply embedded in nearly every modern software product—often comprising 70–90% of today’s codebases. This section underscores that developers rarely start from scratch, instead assembling solutions from existing packages supported by large global communities. While this accelerates innovation and efficiency, it also creates blind spots when organizations don’t fully track what open source is being used, where it originated, or how it is maintained. The session emphasizes that recognizing open source as foundational—not peripheral—is a prerequisite for responsible software production.

Key Risks in Open Source and Software Supply Chains

A major portion of the conversation highlights the four categories of risk that open source introduces: compliance, security vulnerabilities, export restrictions, and operational risk. Compliance challenges arise when licensing obligations are unknown or misunderstood, while security vulnerabilities—especially in outdated or unmaintained components—can expose entire systems. Export restrictions tied to cryptographic components can create unexpected legal barriers, and operational risk emerges when critical dependencies lack active maintainers. The take‑away is clear: without accurate visibility into software composition, organizations cannot manage these risks effectively.

Real‑World Example: How a Single Component Broke Thousands of Builds

The webinar recounts a powerful case study involving a small utility called “my_magic,” where a licensing conflict led to earlier MIT‑licensed versions being removed, causing global build failures overnight. This scenario illustrates how even tiny dependencies can trigger widespread operational disruption when their licensing or composition is not fully understood. The example serves as a compelling argument for proactive scanning, dependency intelligence, and rigorous SBOM management to anticipate and mitigate these kinds of surprises.

Global Regulatory Shifts That Raise the Stakes

A core theme of the session centers on major regulatory changes across the U.S. and EU—particularly new cybersecurity, resilience, and supply chain transparency mandates. The U.S. executive order requires software bills of materials (SBOMs), secure development practices, and attestation processes, all of which directly impact any producer whose software may be used in federal environments. In Europe, the NIS2 Directive, DORA, and the Cyber Resilience Act introduce broad, cross‑industry requirements for risk management, incident reporting, patching, and end‑to‑end supply chain security. Together, these regulations signal a global shift toward mandatory accountability rather than voluntary best practices.

Why SBOMs Are Becoming a Software Industry Standard

The webinar dedicates a substantial section to explaining why SBOMs—software bills of materials—are emerging as essential artifacts for transparency, security, and compliance. SBOMs provide ingredient‑label visibility into every component within a product, enabling organizations to respond quickly when new vulnerabilities arise. The discussion outlines standards like SPDX, the need to track dependencies across product variants, and the importance of combining SBOM data with license texts, usage details, and version histories. This topic reinforces that SBOMs are not optional paperwork but a strategic asset for both engineering efficiency and regulatory readiness.

How Generative AI Introduces New Code and Licensing Risks

The session also explores the growing impact of generative AI tools on software development. While these tools dramatically accelerate coding, they can inadvertently reproduce copyrighted or licensed open source code without attribution, creating hidden compliance liabilities. The webinar includes examples showing AI-generated snippets that mirror existing open source code—but without the original license headers—making it nearly impossible for teams to detect the source without specialized tooling. This section provides an eye‑opening look at how AI can accelerate delivery but also multiply risk if organizations lack strong policies and scanning capabilities.

Indemnification Limitations and Why AI Safeguards Still Fall Short

In discussing AI-related risks, the webinar dives into why indemnification offered by AI vendors, while helpful, is limited. These protections typically apply only to unmodified output and often exclude consequential damages, meaning organizations still carry significant exposure. Liability caps tied to contract value further restrict their usefulness. The session stresses that AI safeguards cannot replace the need for internal validation, code scanning, and clear policies governing AI‑assisted development.

Path Forward: Building a Resilient, Compliant Software Supply Chain

The webinar concludes with a blueprint for strengthening software supply chains: implementing strong open source governance, using automated SCA tools capable of detecting full components and snippets, enforcing clear policies around open source and AI-assisted development, and maintaining accurate SBOMs across all products. This closing section emphasizes that security, compliance, and legal readiness all converge on a shared foundation—knowing exactly what is in your software and continuously monitoring it. The message is both cautionary and empowering: with the right processes, software producers can dramatically reduce risk while enabling faster, safer innovation.

Speakers

Frequently Asked Questions

Open source software brings enormous advantages, but it also introduces several important risks that software producers must manage. Compliance issues can arise when licensing terms aren’t fully understood or followed, particularly when components include copyleft licenses. Security vulnerabilities are another top concern, especially when outdated or unmaintained components remain embedded in products. Operational and export‑restriction risks further complicate usage, especially for companies distributing products globally. Understanding and monitoring your full dependency list is essential for reducing exposure.

Software supply chains have grown increasingly complex, making it difficult for organizations to fully understand where their components come from and how secure they really are. As attackers increasingly target open source components as entry points, vulnerabilities can ripple across thousands of organizations at once. High‑profile ransomware incidents show how a single exploited dependency can shut down operations, disrupt customers, and trigger significant financial loss. New regulations in the U.S. and EU now require higher levels of transparency and accountability, pushing supply chain security to the forefront. Strong governance and continuous monitoring are now non‑negotiable for modern software teams.

A Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) is a detailed inventory of all open source and third‑party components within a product. It helps teams quickly identify which products are affected when new vulnerabilities are discovered, enabling faster and more accurate remediation. SBOMs also help organizations respond to customer and regulatory requirements that increasingly mandate transparency into software composition. With thousands of potential dependencies in a single product, manual tracking is no longer viable. An SBOM gives software producers the visibility they need to manage risk effectively and confidently.

These new EU regulations expand security and compliance expectations across industries, requiring stronger cybersecurity controls, risk management processes, and incident reporting. They apply not only to major corporations but also to smaller organizations selling digital products or services in the EU. Many requirements focus on securing the entire supply chain, not just proprietary components. This means software producers must understand the security posture of all dependencies and ensure responsible open source management. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties, making early preparation essential.

While the Executive Order primarily applies to software sold to the U.S. government, its impact extends far beyond federal contracts. Many private sector customers now expect SBOMs, secure development practices, and attestations that match or exceed federal standards. Because organizations cannot inspect proprietary code directly, they rely on software suppliers to provide this transparency. This shift means software producers must implement formal processes for identifying vulnerabilities and tracking third‑party components. Even companies with no government customers are feeling the downstream influence of these requirements.

Small teams can still build a strong compliance program with the right processes and automation. The first step is establishing policies for evaluating and approving open source components before use. Automated scanning tools help detect licenses, vulnerabilities, and outdated components without requiring manual review of every file. Maintaining an SBOM and keeping dependency information organized reduces the burden of audits and customer inquiries. With clear guidelines and the right tools, even small teams can manage compliance efficiently.

Generative AI tools can unintentionally reproduce copyrighted or open source code without proper attribution, creating licensing and compliance challenges. Because developers often paste snippets directly into products, these risks can enter the codebase unnoticed. Without scanning or review, companies may unknowingly distribute code under licenses incompatible with their business model. AI‑generated output can also contain inaccuracies or hallucinations that introduce bugs or security issues. Treating AI‑assisted development with the same rigor as human‑written code is essential for maintaining product integrity.

The most reliable approach is to use automated code‑scanning tools capable of identifying partial matches and code snippets—not just full files. These tools compare code against large repositories of open source projects to detect similarities, even when variable names or formatting differ. By running scans during code review or CI/CD processes, teams can catch problematic suggestions before they enter the final product. Maintaining detailed SBOMs and usage documentation provides further clarity on where components originate. Combining policy, training, and automation is the most effective strategy.

Building a secure supply chain starts with visibility—knowing exactly which components are used, where they come from, and how they are maintained. Implementing an SBOM for every product provides the foundation for proactive security and compliance. Automated vulnerability scanning and dependency monitoring help detect issues early and reduce manual workload. Teams should also establish policies for secure open source usage, AI‑tool governance, and patch lifecycle management. When combined, these practices create a resilient environment that reduces risk and increases customer trust.

Inadequate visibility into open source components can lead to unexpected build failures, security incidents, or licensing violations—all of which harm operational stability. A single unmaintained dependency can cause widespread outages or force last‑minute re-engineering. Customers increasingly expect transparency and may require SBOMs or security audits before purchasing software. Poor handling of open source risk can delay sales cycles and damage long‑term trust. Strong open source governance helps minimize these disruptions and supports smoother business growth.

Resources

Want to learn more?

See how Revenera's end-to-end solution delivers a complete, accurate SBOM while managing license compliance and security.